HX160-260 copper busbar leveling machine busbar bending machine

Measured data and reference conditions — HX160-260

Values per the model datasheet. Each paragraph is self-contained and states the test condition, the value and the comparison baseline.

Two working widths of the same machine

Test condition: a direct comparison between the two sizes of the HX160-260. Value: a 160 × 12 mm working range on the 3 kW version, occupying 1,580 × 800 × 1,300 mm, against a 260 × 12 mm range on the 5.5 kW version, occupying 1,700 × 1,000 × 1,300 mm. Comparison baseline: a single-width machine, which forces the purchase of a second unit when the bar width grows. Effect: the size is selected from the actual bar width, for the same 1,300 mm machine height and a 120 × 200 mm increase in footprint.

Flatness restored before punching

Test condition: leveling a 12 mm thick copper bar before it enters the punching and bending stages. Value: a 12 mm processing thickness in both widths, at 3 kW or 5.5 kW. Comparison baseline: punching and bending bar that is still curved from the coil, where the residual curvature shows up as an out-of-tolerance assembly. Effect: the flatness that downstream panel assembly relies on is restored at the entry of the process.

Covering the busbar width range

Test condition: processing bars across the panel-building width range. Value: 160 mm or 260 mm maximum width at a common 12 mm thickness. Comparison baseline: hand straightening with a mallet and a flat plate, which is not repeatable. Effect: leveling becomes a machine operation with a determinate width and thickness limit.

Installation footprint

Test condition: placing the leveler in line with the punching and bending stations. Value: 1,580 × 800 × 1,300 mm on the 160 mm version and 1,700 × 1,000 × 1,300 mm on the 260 mm version. Comparison baseline: sending bars out for leveling, which adds transport and lead time. Effect: leveling is brought into the shop at a footprint smaller than a single 3-in-1 machine table.